Business Week has just released their annual ranking of 100 Top Brands.
Not sure I fully understand the method, but it seems that the ranking is based on financial datas more than marketing ones (such as brand awareness...). Business Week assigns a "value" (in US$) to each brand.
Well again, there should be discussions about what the brand value is. I understand the method here is to link the value of the brand to the potential revenues it should bring 'by itself' to the company owning it. This is how Nike can be ranked 31st, while Merill Lynch is 21st.
Also interesting is the fact that these top 100 brands are all geographically dispatched between a dozen of countries only. U.S. mainly, then Europe, then a few Asian ones (Japan, S. Korea)... I bet in a few years, Chinese brands will start to be listed there...
Les commentaires récents